(b) A responding tribunal of this state, to the extent not prohibited by other law, may do one or more of the following:

(1) Issue or enforce a support order, modify a child support order, determine the controlling child support order, or determine parentage;

(2) Order an obligor to comply with a support order, specifying the amount and the manner of compliance;

(3) Order income withholding;

(4) Determine the amount of any arrearages, and specify a method of payment;

(5) Enforce orders by civil or criminal contempt, or both;

(6) Set aside property for satisfaction of the support order;

(7) Place liens and order execution on the obligor's property;

(8) Order an obligor to keep the tribunal informed of the obligor's current residential address, telephone number, employer, address of employment, and telephone number at the place of employment;

(9) Issue a bench warrant for an obligor who has failed after proper notice to appear at a hearing ordered by the tribunal and enter the bench warrant in any local and state computer systems for criminal warrants;

(10) Order the obligor to seek appropriate employment by specified methods;

(11) Award reasonable attorney's fees and other fees and costs; and

(12) Grant any other available remedy.

(c) A responding tribunal of this state shall include in a support order issued under this article, or in the documents accompanying the order, the calculations on which the support order is based.

(d) A responding tribunal of this state may not condition the payment of a support order issued under this article upon compliance by a party with provisions for visitation.

(e) If a responding tribunal of this state issues an order under this article, the tribunal shall send a copy of the order to the petitioner and the respondent and to the initiating tribunal, if any.

(f) If requested to enforce a support order, arrears, or judgment or modify a support order stated in a foreign currency, a responding tribunal of this state shall convert the amount stated in the foreign currency to the equivalent amount in dollars under the applicable official or market exchange rate as publicly reported.

Source: L. 93: Entire article R&RE, p. 1589, § 1, effective January 1, 1995. L. 97: (a) and (e) amended, p. 537, § 7, effective July 1. L. 2003: (a), IP(b), and (b)(1) amended and (f) added, p. 1251, § 14, effective July 1, 2004.

Editor's note: This section was contained in an article that was repealed and reenacted in 1993. Provisions of this section, as it existed in 1993, are similar to those contained in 14-5-119, 14-5-120, and 14-5-127 as said sections existed in 1992, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this article.

Reference to the Uniform Parentage Act in the Colorado Uniform Interstate Family Support Act simply establishes a method to determine parentage. Therefore the trial court erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to enter orders granting parenting time. In Interest of R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. App. 1997).

An order requiring one party to repay or reimburse the other party for overpaid child support qualifies as a "reimbursement", thus district court had subject matter jurisdiction to issue an order regarding overpayments. In re Haddad, 93 P.3d 617 (Colo. App. 2004).