Source: L. 93: Entire article R&RE, p. 1587, § 1, effective January 1, 1995. L. 97: Entire section amended, p. 535, § 4, effective July 1. L. 2003: Entire section amended, p. 1246, § 7, effective July 1, 2004.

A court of this state must recognize the continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of a tribunal of another state that has issued a child support order pursuant to law substantially similar to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. In re Zinke, 967 P.2d 210 (Colo. App. 1998).

The issuing tribunal retains continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over its order as long as one of the individual parties or the child continues to reside in the issuing state. In re Zinke, 967 P.2d 210 (Colo. App. 1998); In re Hillstrom, 126 P.3d 315 (Colo. App. 2005).

The issuing tribunal has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over its order unless each party consents in writing to a court of another state assuming continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the order. In re Hillstrom, 126 P.3d 315 (Colo. App. 2005).